Uhbik 2.0 public alpha 02, rev. 9629 (Catalina ready)

Official support for: u-he.com
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

lunardigs wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:47 pm
llze wrote: Sat Feb 01, 2025 10:09 pm I miss Uhbik-G
Oh no, so Uhbik-G isn't available in 2.0?
I mean I miss it emotionally :hihi: :clown: :hug:
JamWide - a cross-platform Ninjam client for DAWs

Post

llze wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 9:47 pm
lunardigs wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:47 pm
llze wrote: Sat Feb 01, 2025 10:09 pm I miss Uhbik-G
Oh no, so Uhbik-G isn't available in 2.0?
I mean I miss it emotionally :hihi: :clown: :hug:
It's an emotional plugin for sure :hihi: ... I would miss it too

Btw, does this mean we can't have 1.0 and 2.0 installed together?
I suppose not, but I haven't been able to test yet.

Post

lunardigs wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 9:59 pm Btw, does this mean we can't have 1.0 and 2.0 installed together?
Version 2 will replace version 1 and is backwards compatible, so there is no need to have both installed in parallel.
That QA guy from planet u-he.

Post

tasmaniandevil wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 6:26 am
lunardigs wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2025 9:59 pm Btw, does this mean we can't have 1.0 and 2.0 installed together?
Version 2 will replace version 1 and is backwards compatible, so there is no need to have both installed in parallel.
Please excuse my curiosity:

Does this “backward compatibility” mean that the DSP of both versions are exactly the same?

In other words:

Has the code responsible for the sound quality of Uhbik 2.0 improved/changed? Or is the DSP code exactly the same as Uhbik 1.0?

I ask because I though that Uhbik 2.0's code (including its DSP) was going to be written from the ground up. Maybe I was wrong?

Post

limitlesssss wrote: Tue Feb 04, 2025 9:41 amI ask because I though that Uhbik 2.0's code (including its DSP) was going to be written from the ground up. Maybe I was wrong?
It is not rewritten from the ground up.

However, ancient academia-style DSP building blocks for numerous filters have been replaced by modern counterparts based on analogue modelling. This doesn't change the sound fundamentally, but it does improve a few characteristics, e.g. less DC build-up.

Post

Any movement on Uhbik development?
On a number of Macs

Post

We are constantly working on it.
That QA guy from planet u-he.

Post

No new Beta I guess?

Post

No. No new beta. They're working on it and will post here when something is ready.

Post

Can't wait to make Uhbik-D my default delay plug-in. I hope Uhbik 2.0 is inching closer and closer to completion.

Post

limitlesssss wrote: Sat Apr 05, 2025 10:38 am Can't wait to make Uhbik-D my default delay plug-in. I hope Uhbik 2.0 is inching closer and closer to completion.
It is.

Post

Can we have better contrast for the text please. I'm finding several of your plugins hard to read. Thanks.

Post

A mini update: Uhbik 2.0 now has reached the stage where I'm coming back in to do some final stuff. With Zebralette 3 Beta 2 out the door, and Uhbik on the finish line, I've gathered my left over tickets to fix some things, upgrade the envelope follower into something workable, improve the modulation system, revisit a new filter model for Runciter and do some cleaning up.

The possibility of going beta is definitely coming closer.

Post

getting this right, 6 years in alpha?
100 High Quality Soundsets: Omnisphere 2, Dune 3, Tone 2 Synths, Pigments, Uhe Synths, Halion, Spire, and others.

TTU Youtube

Post

Touch The Universe wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 5:07 pm getting this right, 6 years in alpha?
Lead devs left twice

Not ideal, but can happen with smaller teams.
Image

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”