From my perspective I don't want any significant changes to the UX. I highly suspect I am not alone in thisnoiseboyuk wrote: Sun Oct 19, 2025 7:34 amI'm one of the ones who would have bought a pitchfork just to wave it at Spectrasonics if they fundamentally changed the UX. It works great and I don't want it changed.jobinho wrote: Sun Oct 19, 2025 4:47 am Many people are okay with that as they love Omnisphere as it is, me personally, I'd have liked to see some improvements to the UX for the 200 bucks.
But genuine question - what kind of concept would work for those who keep saying it looks Y2K? What is out there that has the vastness and complexity of Omnisphere that is much quicker and easier to use in practice?
I would wager that the majority of revenue Spectrasonics will make from Omnisphere 3 over the next 12-18 months will come from people dropping $199 on upgrades
And I would also wager that the vast majority of those don't want any significant changes to the UX. Like me they want the look and feel of the product they have owned and have been using for a while
I think the new Global Controls for many users will be a Godsend and is the only significant UX change they need
One final thought for those who want a different UX for deeper sound design use cases. Get yourself a copy of Gig Performer 5 to use not just with Omnisphere but with any plugin you own. Why? Because you can quickly and easily use it to create any kind of GUI you want. With Omnisphere you would just expose whatever you want to include in your custom GUI to host automation. Then drag and drop knobs, faders, buttons, toggles, in what ever color you want, and whatever size you want onto your custom GUI (which Gig Performer calls a rack space) and assign them to one (or more) of those things you want to control and label it however you want. Each control can then be inverted, have its range limited, have a curve applied to them and basically be setup exactly how you want
