Mulab 8
-
Suono & Computer Suono & Computer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=388513 - KVRist
- 99 posts since 14 Nov, 2016 from Italy
-
Suono & Computer Suono & Computer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=388513
- KVRist
- 99 posts since 14 Nov, 2016 from Italy
According to you, the idea of creating a sampler (MuSampla, for example) that can load directly from a server (website) internet of FLAC audio files or compressed without loss of data can be a good idea?
-
- KVRAF
- 7137 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
The internet isn't (and probably will never be) fast enough to make this a sensible option. You'd need to download them to local storage for use.
If you mean "can I make an instrument that includes a set of samples available on the internet?" then that's a different matter.
If you mean "can I make an instrument that includes a set of samples available on the internet?" then that's a different matter.
-
Suono & Computer Suono & Computer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=388513
- KVRist
- 99 posts since 14 Nov, 2016 from Italy
Thanks, I mean something similar to MixCraft ... where you look for the name of the sample (audio file) from the freesound.org site and then download it into the DAW as an audio file, only that instead of downloading it as audio files, you can download it directly to ' internal sampler, maybe even with the possibility of automatically mapped it...
Last edited by Suono & Computer on Sat Mar 02, 2019 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4827 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
^^^ You can set up your browser preference so it downloads to your sample folder; then open the file in your sampler of choice: https://www.mutools.com/info/docs/commo ... owser.html
F E E D
Y O U R
F L O W
Y O U R
F L O W
-
Suono & Computer Suono & Computer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=388513
- KVRist
- 99 posts since 14 Nov, 2016 from Italy
OK, thank you. I noticed that almost all the audio & Midi software work stations have a timeline that starts at 0 (left) without leaving any second of empty space. Do you think it would be useful to have a gap of about three seconds before the timeline starts? An empty space that then becomes effective in rendering. Thank you.
-
ruffindajungle ruffindajungle https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=258782
- KVRer
- 18 posts since 14 Jun, 2011
Tried to see what the hype was. It has to have the worst demo made by human being. You have hiss..fine, then audio drop outs and finally when you do get your loop in and some slices reversed you get the 30 min time limit and audio is gone. Really? Maybe it is a lot of fun and useful tool but i feel like the engineer was laughing his arse off when i try to demo it. Well i'm having the last laugh this time.
-
- KVRAF
- 12744 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
Of course it's a pity to read you had a bad experience, i'm sorry about that. At the very start of MuLab 8 Demo these limitations are clearly shown, didn't you get that info alert? Allmost all other DAWs have similar limitations for their demo version, don't you agree?
Sorry again, and thanks for your feedback.
Audio drop outs are not part of the demo limitations, except after the 30 minutes demo time. Please provide more details about the audio drop outs you encountered than i can have a look at that.
Sorry again, and thanks for your feedback.
-
ruffindajungle ruffindajungle https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=258782
- KVRer
- 18 posts since 14 Jun, 2011
Ok enough of those adventures with demo mysteries, i found someone made a nice timestretch comparisons and could use Mulab on drums. Good job Mutools!
I know it's probably Paypal Eu thing but i could not see the place where i can buy the full version without paypal. After purchase it throws me into this page, either login or register..
If you are inside EU, can i make you a Sepa transfer? No fees for the sharks
I know it's probably Paypal Eu thing but i could not see the place where i can buy the full version without paypal. After purchase it throws me into this page, either login or register..
If you are inside EU, can i make you a Sepa transfer? No fees for the sharks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 12744 posts since 24 Jun, 2008 from Europe
-
- Banned
- 3564 posts since 22 Aug, 2019
Wouldn't it make sense to always indicate the latest build with double digits? Currently it is for instance 8.1.5 and 8.1.15. Build 8.1.50 would make it more obvious which is the more recent one...
-
- KVRAF
- 7137 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from London, UK
8.1.5 comes before 8.1.15 because 5 is less that 15, right?
-
- KVRian
- 1441 posts since 4 Oct, 2012 from Utah
The period/dot does not indicate a decimal, rather a delimiter or separator. The builds roughly go as such: Major.Minor.Build . As pljones stated, 5 < 15 < 50 which makes sense in this versioning scheme.
-
- Banned
- 3564 posts since 22 Aug, 2019
Still, I think it would make more sense to do it like with official dates, 19.02.10
In Reaper it is for instance:
5.32
5.311
5.31
5.30
https://www.reaper.fm/whatsnew.txt
With your logic, .311 would be the more recent version, not .32.
In Reaper it is for instance:
5.32
5.311
5.31
5.30
https://www.reaper.fm/whatsnew.txt
With your logic, .311 would be the more recent version, not .32.
-
- KVRian
- 1441 posts since 4 Oct, 2012 from Utah
Rolling versions (date based) work well for subscription or rolling release software, but not for software with development cycles such as Mulab. Take for example the common YYYY.MM version scheme. What's the difference between 2019.12 and 2020.1 ? Well, the difference could be a bug fix, or a major version release. There's no clear indicator of a feature boost. Now, for software that's under a development cycle built on incremental upgrades instead of major feature boosts, the progressive model works. Mulab however doesn't exactly have the resources for a progressive/incremental development cycle as there is only one developer.
With regards to Reaper, it's currently in version 5.983, yes? What happens after 5.999? 5.9991? That last one seems like the improvement is more marginal than a full .001 update, which is more likely. The developer would have to plan out each release or plan out how many releases they can build under a major version, which is a strange artificial limitation.
I think the better lesson here is that versioning is a game between informing users about a new version, and how big the new version is. The rolling/progressive versioning schemes are great for knowing what's newer, but fail to inform users at a quick glance about the feature increases. On the other hand, Major.Minor.Build schemes are more difficult to read for what's newer, but do a much better job at informing the user the kind/how big of update it is.
With regards to Reaper, it's currently in version 5.983, yes? What happens after 5.999? 5.9991? That last one seems like the improvement is more marginal than a full .001 update, which is more likely. The developer would have to plan out each release or plan out how many releases they can build under a major version, which is a strange artificial limitation.
I think the better lesson here is that versioning is a game between informing users about a new version, and how big the new version is. The rolling/progressive versioning schemes are great for knowing what's newer, but fail to inform users at a quick glance about the feature increases. On the other hand, Major.Minor.Build schemes are more difficult to read for what's newer, but do a much better job at informing the user the kind/how big of update it is.
