MXXX: Lightest possible +/- gain module?
-
- KVRist
- 452 posts since 21 Jul, 2018
I've got quite a few point in the current config where I need to add a simple gain stage, and nothing else. I don't even need separate L/R controls (prefer not to), but I do often need +/-. I basically just need a single gainstage, and an enable button.
What's the absolute minimal CPU draw module to use for this? Utility? ChVolume? Something else?
What's the absolute minimal CPU draw module to use for this? Utility? ChVolume? Something else?
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Utility is a good choice for these simple tasks.
- KVRian
- 710 posts since 7 May, 2002 from Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Not to contradict jmg and Vojtech, but on my computer (and accidentally left in low performance power mode) with the cpu benchmark I found channel volume and matrix were the lowest, with a very close second place by mixer. Utility was the highest of the 4. I'll use mixer for its convenience of a single parameter for volume.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 452 posts since 21 Jul, 2018
OK, thx. I haven't measured, but guessed utility might be higher just due to the number of fiddly bits. Definitely want one slider, though, so mixer it is.ericzang wrote:Not to contradict jmg and Vojtech, but on my computer (and accidentally left in low performance power mode) with the cpu benchmark I found channel volume and matrix were the lowest, with a very close second place by mixer. Utility was the highest of the 4. I'll use mixer for its convenience of a single parameter for volume.
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
I'll probably create just some Volume & Panorama module, which is already there for MSoundFactory (not sure if the released version though).
