even with audio.. you need to time in audio too you know...
man, I hate these 'almost there' features...
I'm I the only one annoyed by this?!
-
- KVRian
- 1372 posts since 22 Sep, 2003 from New Delhi, India
Last edited by Sidhu on Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
maybe im misunderstanding (dont use live' recording much myself) but wouldnt setting the in and out markers 1 or 2 bars early / late give you a pseudo count-in space on each pass ???
slainte
rob
slainte
rob-
- KVRAF
- 1615 posts since 28 Mar, 2005
the problem is that you need to hear the material on the track you're punching into all the way up to the punch...
-
- KVRAF
- 3617 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from Bradford - The Armpit of Britain
Guess we should just use punch mode for now then - as long us we aren't trying to overlay clips - as that doesn't seem to work - unless it's just me.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
Punch does nothing for my cituation (mostly midi recording). I still have to move things. If I have a song of 24 bars, and I want to record on Bar 16, In T1 I would place the cursor on bar 15 press R and off I went. It was fast. I didnt have to keep turning loop on and off. (damn I'm lazy)
-
- KVRian
- 830 posts since 13 Oct, 2003
like rob said sounds ok to me, it's just one bar..! and to have a onebar break during looprecording is fine anyway 
but after all you all are right, this shouldn't be needed.
but after all you all are right, this shouldn't be needed.i need a lunch break
-
- KVRer
- 28 posts since 22 Oct, 2004
This has been driving me crazy. All thats needed is a setting to 1) toggle lead-in on/off & 2) set the length of a lead in; then the punch-in tool would be far more effective. I think this is how it worked in Logic, and I now realize how much I miss that feature.
I'll put in a feature request...
I'll put in a feature request...
-
- KVRian
- 830 posts since 13 Oct, 2003
@ad80 but that's just in loop mode, why not switching it off, if you want to do it that way ? it's just one keypress more. you can put the shortcuts side by side and than it's still one keypress
i need a lunch break
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
Uhh, Its actually two more keypresses becuase I then have to turn it on after recording again to continue listenting in a loop. I have to keep remember to hit "L" before or after I record, sometimes after editing I cant even remember if I pressed it or not, so I hit L and then it turns out I already had it turned on so I just turned it off again, so it turns into 4 keypresses instead of none compared to T1.aldi wrote:@ad80 but that's just in loop mode, why not switching it off, if you want to do it that way ? it's just one keypress more. you can put the shortcuts side by side and than it's still one keypress
And what do we gain from it? Theres no new functionality as far as recording, except it helps out in the audio loop to have all the loops the same size. But as far as midi recording, it slows it down. Thats why I think it should be an option for the mostly midi folk.
-
- KVRian
- 830 posts since 13 Oct, 2003
ok, another way. instead of setting loop on during recordingsessions, set markerpoints to quickly go to the parts you're working on. it's also a workaround and i also would prefer a normal way. i think jules made it that way cause his philosophy is, what you see is what you get: loop recording, means loop recording and not record a loop after some time of not recording or don't record a loop allthough the loop is turned on (i bet for the same reson we will never see playlists that makes the playcursor jump around in the arrangement). and for the same reson solo works that way....
-
- KVRAF
- 2874 posts since 22 Oct, 2002 from "somewhere between digital and analog"
Geez, we've been through this before haven't we... I was asking about count-in on loop record ages ago... didn't he say it couldn't be done? 
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
What the f**k are you talking about? I'm not asking for count-in on loop, I'm asking for the cursor to NOT jump to the beginning of the loop when I hit record in loop mode. I dont need count-in on loop if I can just put the cursor at the end and have it loop back to the beginning (Like T1!).DHR53 wrote:Geez, we've been through this before haven't we... I was asking about count-in on loop record ages ago... didn't he say it couldn't be done?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
Well, putting the cursor exactly where you want it to start recording, then having it jump a mile backwards to the first marker is not exactly "what you see is what you get".aldi wrote: i think jules made it that way cause his philosophy is, what you see is what you get:
-
- KVRAF
- 2874 posts since 22 Oct, 2002 from "somewhere between digital and analog"
Now calm down... Are you saying count-in on loop mode, wouldn't solve the problem? ...And eliminate the workaround in the first place... 
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
Yeah but its common knowledge that its impossible to doDHR53 wrote:Now calm down... Are you saying count-in on loop mode, wouldn't solve the problem? ...And eliminate the workaround in the first place...
. So I just want it to work like T1 does. Its much faster for midi.