Proving use of legally bought samples
-
thebaggytrouseredone thebaggytrouseredone https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=169368
- KVRist
- 450 posts since 30 Dec, 2007
To start of I don't agree with downloading illegally but I have heard of people using torrent sites to download Loopmasters packs and other packs.
How can you tell what was bought and downloaded legally and what wasn't?
I pay for my sample packs or download free packs, use freesound.org and archive.org, there is no need to download illegally.
How can you tell what was bought and downloaded legally and what wasn't?
I pay for my sample packs or download free packs, use freesound.org and archive.org, there is no need to download illegally.
simon
-
- KVRAF
- 10170 posts since 2 Jan, 2005 from somewhere in the woods
registrations, accounts, receipts, original cds or dvds
"It dreamed itself along"
- KVRAF
- 9590 posts since 17 Sep, 2002 from Gothenburg Sweden
-
penguinfromdeep penguinfromdeep https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=193898
- KVRAF
- 1993 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
Yeah, proving to who? I don't know actually if there has been such cases in the past (sample company suing somebody using illegally downloaded content in a released track) , would be interesting to know in fact ... But how to prove it? Sample makers don't have the resources to ask from any person who used their samples for the original receipt etc ... Quite a hassle
disclaimer: I am totally against downloading & using illegally downloaded samples in commercial work, no less because I work in the sample business myself!
disclaimer: I am totally against downloading & using illegally downloaded samples in commercial work, no less because I work in the sample business myself!
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool
- KVRAF
- 43938 posts since 11 Aug, 2008 from clown world
Well, unless you're lying to yourself, then you know if you downloaded something illegally or not.
Then again, you can't always tell that what you purchased in good faith is actually legal.
What I mean is: I purchased a sample pack from a well known provider. On listening through the material, I noticed a particular sample (a vocal line) that was obviously lifted from an old chart hit.
Then again, you can't always tell that what you purchased in good faith is actually legal.
What I mean is: I purchased a sample pack from a well known provider. On listening through the material, I noticed a particular sample (a vocal line) that was obviously lifted from an old chart hit.
-
thebaggytrouseredone thebaggytrouseredone https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=169368
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 450 posts since 30 Dec, 2007
I was just wondering as people using illegally downloaded samples get to use the content for free and us honest people pay for ours and if they can get away with it then it just annoys me that i'm paying for something that others are using for free and no one notices the difference.
simon
- KVRAF
- 12185 posts since 7 Sep, 2006 from Roseville, CA
The developer's bank account does.thebaggytrouseredone wrote:...and no one notices the difference.
Logic Pro | LUNA Pro | OB-X8 | Prophet 6 | OB-6 | Rev2 | TEO-5 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Minitaur | Deepmind 12D | Integra-7 | TR-1000 | Analog RYTM mk2 | Digitakt 2 | TD-3 MO | TD-3 | Maschine+
-
- Skunk Mod
- 21249 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Pony Pasture
It annoys you. It annoys me. It annoys everyone who's legit.
There y'go.Aloysius wrote:Well, unless you're lying to yourself, then you know if you downloaded something illegally or not.
-
thebaggytrouseredone thebaggytrouseredone https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=169368
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 450 posts since 30 Dec, 2007
I realise the developer would know and I guess this is the same argument as using warez software, because on a finished track who would know what was legally used and what wasn't.cryophonik wrote:The developer's bank account does.thebaggytrouseredone wrote:...and no one notices the difference.
simon
-
penguinfromdeep penguinfromdeep https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=193898
- KVRAF
- 1993 posts since 18 Nov, 2008
Unfortunately I think they do get away with it. But you should feel good about buying the samples, it keeps the developers going.thebaggytrouseredone wrote:I was just wondering as people using illegally downloaded samples get to use the content for free and us honest people pay for ours and if they can get away with it then it just annoys me that i'm paying for something that others are using for free and no one notices the difference.
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
That's the cause why I avoid uncleared samples, for example from Looperman. If I have bad luck, if something is from an well known song, then I have a problem...Aloysius wrote:Well, unless you're lying to yourself, then you know if you downloaded something illegally or not.
Then again, you can't always tell that what you purchased in good faith is actually legal.
What I mean is: I purchased a sample pack from a well known provider. On listening through the material, I noticed a particular sample (a vocal line) that was obviously lifted from an old chart hit.
Would be interesting to know how much people are being sued because of illegal sample downloads...
-
- KVRian
- 508 posts since 6 Nov, 2009
Not exactly the same "type" of samples the OP is talking about, but Cinesamples was awarded a lot of money in a digital piracy suit not too long ago:
http://soniccontrol.tv/2012/03/11/calif ... racy-suit/
IIRC, they used digital watermarking to trace things:
http://www.vi-control.net/forum/viewtop ... 60#3618160
http://soniccontrol.tv/2012/03/11/calif ... racy-suit/
IIRC, they used digital watermarking to trace things:
http://www.vi-control.net/forum/viewtop ... 60#3618160
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
what i'd like to know is how you prove the samples you bought were not already stolen from someone else by the person who made the pack. 
(the term 'ripped' has been used rather than 'stolen' to emphasize the fact that the use of the term 'stolen' is completely incorrect.)
(the term 'ripped' has been used rather than 'stolen' to emphasize the fact that the use of the term 'stolen' is completely incorrect.)
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
That's a very confusing news. On one sentence he is called Mr. Casas, on the other Mr. Vargas and in the beginning Mr. Pablo Vargas Casas. It sounds as if there were two different persons.mgpqa1 wrote:Not exactly the same "type" of samples the OP is talking about, but Cinesamples was awarded a lot of money in a digital piracy suit not too long ago:
http://soniccontrol.tv/2012/03/11/calif ... racy-suit/
IIRC, they used digital watermarking to trace things:
http://www.vi-control.net/forum/viewtop ... 60#3618160
-
- Banned
- 870 posts since 26 Sep, 2008
This takes time and money and only makes sense if you're in the same country as the "bad guy".penguinfromdeep wrote:I don't know actually if there has been such cases in the past (sample company suing somebody using illegally downloaded content in a released track)
It's more effective to take down the whole release everywhere (YouTube, SoundCloud, Beatport, ...) with the help of the DMCA
CLOSING SALE! My samplepacks: Vintage House Stabs | Deep House Chords + Volume 2 | House Piano Chords
