@making your own: I think there is a cost up front for the materials to do this right, but it's QUITE the viable option. You can probably keep the cost down and pretty much assure yourself of "best possible quality"
Do expensive cables make a difference?
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Excellent choices btw. They are NOT expensive cables when you consider what some of us are saying about "performance". There is a reason top musicians use them instead of bin cables 
@making your own: I think there is a cost up front for the materials to do this right, but it's QUITE the viable option. You can probably keep the cost down and pretty much assure yourself of "best possible quality"
@making your own: I think there is a cost up front for the materials to do this right, but it's QUITE the viable option. You can probably keep the cost down and pretty much assure yourself of "best possible quality"
-
- KVRian
- 836 posts since 28 Nov, 2007
You're entitled to whatever you want to feel or believe in.hibidy wrote:I read two sentences and feel I need a shower. Big difference between a guy with an axe to grind and reasonable information. Sorry yairhol, just how I feel about it.yairhol wrote:Read This:
The 10 biggest lies in audio.
http://sonido.uchile.cl/articulos/tenbi ... saudio.pdf
Science on the other hand is immuned against beliefs.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Uh oh, houston, we have a problem 
Under no circumstances is science to be ignored. BUT this guy has an axe to grind. If the information is presented in a logical fashion, more power to you. BUT if you start using all the "over the top" words to try and make your point......it's not science anymore, is it?
There is a very long boring video floating around on this that is pretty good. It's NOT some guy who had too many energy drinks though
Under no circumstances is science to be ignored. BUT this guy has an axe to grind. If the information is presented in a logical fashion, more power to you. BUT if you start using all the "over the top" words to try and make your point......it's not science anymore, is it?
There is a very long boring video floating around on this that is pretty good. It's NOT some guy who had too many energy drinks though
-
- KVRian
- 836 posts since 28 Nov, 2007
Please elaborate which "over the top words"?hibidy wrote:Uh oh, houston, we have a problem
Under no circumstances is science to be ignored. BUT this guy has an axe to grind. If the information is presented in a logical fashion, more power to you. BUT if you start using all the "over the top" words to try and make your point......it's not science anymore, is it?
There is a very long boring video floating around on this that is pretty good. It's NOT some guy who had too many energy drinks though
The writer is the editor (or was the editor) of
http://www.theaudiocritic.com/
We wouldn't dream of declaring that component A sounds better than B without having performed carefully controlled double-blind listening tests side by side, at levels matched within ±0.1 dB. We consider casual, sequential, "freeform" listening evaluations to be of very limited value.
Furthermore, we not only measure the component under review in a very completely equipped audio laboratory but also bring you, when relevant, a detailed design critique by a graduate engineer. We are accountable for our findings and judgments: we can prove them.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Fair enough, I'll start where I started.........
I stopped right there. I don't care what he has to say. It sounds unintelligent, axe-grinding and sensationalist.
Sorry. I don't like it. I'm interested in any possible facts that can be supplied but this sounds like a guys who had too many espressos.
But it is the
hugest, dirtiest, most cynical, most intelligence-
insulting and, above all, most
fraudulently profitable lie in audio, and
therefore must go to the head of the list.
I stopped right there. I don't care what he has to say. It sounds unintelligent, axe-grinding and sensationalist.
Sorry. I don't like it. I'm interested in any possible facts that can be supplied but this sounds like a guys who had too many espressos.
-
- KVRian
- 836 posts since 28 Nov, 2007
So basically you agree with the point that he has to say but you just don't like his writing style? Because as stated above and elsewhere, his words are backed up by double blind tests and they are facts, which you said you are interested in.
-
- KVRian
- 836 posts since 28 Nov, 2007
Maybe you'd want to read this:
http://www.theaudiocritic.com/back_issu ... c_16_r.pdf
especially the article on page 51 with its conclusions on page 56-57.
Again, all facts and by the same author as before.
Maybe his writing style here will be more to your liking.
http://www.theaudiocritic.com/back_issu ... c_16_r.pdf
especially the article on page 51 with its conclusions on page 56-57.
Again, all facts and by the same author as before.
Maybe his writing style here will be more to your liking.
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
I find it offensive frankly
There is nothing about cable quality that could possibly be any of the things in that quote. I'll read the other thing you posted tomorrow but the idea that someone could be so passionately down on cables is ridiculous. I think the comments I've made here are pretty reasonable and have merit. I look at that statement and I think "here we go again, black/white/no grey" sorry.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35433 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
So we're at the stage of
Statement A : X is intrinsically better than Y
Statement B : Its a lie that X is instrinsically better than Y
Response : "Statement B offends me. Its not black and white."
Hmmm. Funnily enough, though, its not quite as offensive, or hypocritical, as 'Im part of the elite sensible group who know the truth and everyone else is just looking for a fight'
Statement A : X is intrinsically better than Y
Statement B : Its a lie that X is instrinsically better than Y
Response : "Statement B offends me. Its not black and white."
Hmmm. Funnily enough, though, its not quite as offensive, or hypocritical, as 'Im part of the elite sensible group who know the truth and everyone else is just looking for a fight'
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRAF
- 7825 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
Never say m0nster in a thread about anything. The cable guys will hunt you down and sue you.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Monster+Cable+lawsuit
https://www.google.com/search?q=Monster+Cable+lawsuit
Dell Vostro i9 64GB Ram Windows 11 Pro, Cubase, Bitwig, Mixcraft Guitar Pod Go, Linntrument Nektar P1, Novation Launchpad
-
- KVRian
- 836 posts since 28 Nov, 2007
I can't argue about feelings. If you feel offended by facts then I can't do anything about it.hibidy wrote:I find it offensive franklyThere is nothing about cable quality that could possibly be any of the things in that quote. I'll read the other thing you posted tomorrow but the idea that someone could be so passionately down on cables is ridiculous. I think the comments I've made here are pretty reasonable and have merit. I look at that statement and I think "here we go again, black/white/no grey" sorry.
- KVRAF
- 12615 posts since 7 Dec, 2004
cables make a difference. the real question is in the particular case you use them, does that difference actually matter.
personally i just use rusty fence wire and clothes hangers wrapped in old socks, work just as well in the majority of cases.
personally i just use rusty fence wire and clothes hangers wrapped in old socks, work just as well in the majority of cases.
Free plug-ins for Windows, MacOS and Linux. Xhip Synthesizer v8.0 and Xhip Effects Bundle v6.7.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
The coder's credo: We believe our work is neither clever nor difficult; it is done because we thought it would be easy.
Work less; get more done.
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders