Its not absurd, and i didnt demand anything. Infact, all i did was ask if it had this feature.Izak Synthiemental wrote:I cannot understand how anyone would have the audacity to put absurd demands to the developer!
Just so you know why the objections have been raised, Krim, it's the "Essential really" that puts this in the category of "demand" rather than "request". If you'd just said "when I'm working with a set of samples, I find it handy" and left it at that, no one would have complained. FYI, I don't think you'd get any benefit working on sets of 20 samples from a product like this. I've just mapped two drum kits, one with 2557 samples, the other with 2113. In situations like this, being able to use SFZ format works wonderfully. If you just want to drag'n'drop a handful of samples onto a piano roll, you want a different product.Kriminal wrote:If you have ie a drumkit sfz and you want to step program in the PR with the mouse, its good to see whats where. Essentisl really. Lots of drum machines do this.
i still dont see it as a DEMAND...its a comment. I asked if the feature was there, he said it wasnt. I didnt actually ask him to put it in, i just its essential for me, if the product doesnt have it, i wont use it.pljones wrote:Just so you know why the objections have been raised, Krim, it's the "Essential really" that puts this in the category of "demand" rather than "request". If you'd just said "when I'm working with a set of samples, I find it handy" and left it at that, no one would have complained.Kriminal wrote:If you have ie a drumkit sfz and you want to step program in the PR with the mouse, its good to see whats where. Essentisl really. Lots of drum machines do this.
that comment was aimed at the bloke from PA who was talking about GM mapping. I was trying to explain that not everyone uses standard kits/naming. It was just an example.pljones wrote: FYI, I don't think you'd get any benefit working on sets of 20 samples from a product like this. I've just mapped two drum kits, one with 2557 samples, the other with 2113. In situations like this, being able to use SFZ format works wonderfully. If you just want to drag'n'drop a handful of samples onto a piano roll, you want a different product.
Couldn't say it better.Baard wrote:To elaborate:
With Sforzando, you have made exactly what we was missing in a free sfz player. Great DFD, GUI controls, 64bit, Full support for KS, RRs etc.. Linuxsampler has most of these, but its way harder to use and configure. The only thing its missing is multitimbral operation, but it really isnt that important IMO.
Its a real game changer that can turn many more people towards the format, and make it live for a long time. Congratulations Plogue, you will be remembered!
) The (completed) mapping is for the Gorilla kit. Mappings live here.)
http://www.kvraudio.com/news/plogue-upd ... -2-5-21295mabian wrote:I see it's been updated to 1.625 from 1.621 - cannot see any change log though...
- Mario
You can do this already if you do your mixing inside Sforzando. Each kit piece should have a CC assigned to its amplitude, then you'll see that CC on the Controls panel and be able to adjust it in real time / record your adjustments.thermal wrote:With multi out we could have drum kits as well as single instruments
But I would like a separate mixer channel for each drum sound so I can apply vol/pan/plugins/sends/buses etc . Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
