so You use to put reverb on master?
what kind of music?
what parameters regulations? (mix parameter almost "dry" for example?)
Very interesting...
Well, I'm up for it, if you were referencing me.Uncle E wrote:It seems to me that hibidy can upload some examples of what he wants to hear, you can do you best to match them using whatever you like, and then we'll all listen for how close you get. Are you open to that?codec_spurt wrote:Your objective will be to provide three reverbs (any reverb in the world) and make the source files sound better than these three.
Not sure I understand you full well my good man.Turello wrote:@codec_spurt: just to understand...
so You use to put reverb on master?
what kind of music?
what parameters regulations? (mix parameter almost "dry" for example?)![]()
Very interesting...
Ok, take the file I put up. It's not a scientific impulse response so..Turello wrote:@codec_spurt: Thanks Man for answer and forgive my poor english (not my first language)
I (usually on Rock songs) don't use to put Reverb on master (direct or in send but every in single tracks or groups) and this was seems strange to me cause i don't wanna make float el bass or kick but probably sonds good to you... and After all i don't care if a reverb is free or commercial but that he do his dirty work (ergo: what i want!)
Turello wrote:Oh Man, very gentle but i'm not so in confidence with this Roland(ish) sounds, don't know how reverbering this sound and now i'm not with my DAW, my converters, my nearfields etc etc... imo Valhalla make very good reverbs but i use only Shimmer for his modulations on coda\release (i really don't know how explain better: the "air\release sensation")
another interesting "trouble" could be that for years and years all we hear in all productions every the lexicon, TC el, eventide (etc etc) hardware revs and and this imo could accustom badly or spoil the ear to always use the same remedies instead to searching new (creative) ways... o.O
Let's let the KVR members decide:codec_spurt wrote:Then again, no sane man would be able to differentiate between the reverb on that basic impule.
Thank you for posting this, Eric! It is definitely one of the more revealing tests you can do to an algorithmic reverb...Uncle E wrote:Let's let the KVR members decide:
I did my best to match Stian's example using RC 24, RC 48, Toraverb, TAL-Reverb 2, Studio One's Mixverb and Room Reverb, and Ozone 5 Reverb. I spent a decent amount of time with each dialing them in to sound as much like his as possible and only stopped when it became clear to me that I wasn't going to get any closer. Check them out:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vchosjlm57pqk ... s.wav?dl=1
I'll be happy to share the results after everyone has had a chance to listen. I had some pleasant surprises and will almost definitely be changing my go-to native reverbs after this. I recommend everyone try this test for yourselves because you'll probably discover some interesting things, just as I did.
Ok, let's go with that then. Makes sense.Uncle E wrote:Let's let the KVR members decide:codec_spurt wrote:Then again, no sane man would be able to differentiate between the reverb on that basic impule.
You're right, as good as the hybrid reverb sounds in that example, I could not get it any closer than that to sounding like Verberate and I'm sure you're right that it's due to the limitations of the design. In all fairness, though, it got a lot closer (especially in smoothness) than any of the purely algorithmic reverbs.stian wrote:Thank you for posting this, Eric! It is definitely one of the more revealing tests you can do to an algorithmic reverb...I noticed that one of them is hybrid (which limits the tweaking possibilities to some extent), though, so that's probably not really a fair comparison.
Yes, you're right. However, Stian is also right that the closest we can get to objectively evaluating these things is with impulses.codec_spurt wrote:I remember spending an hour or two to get Valhalla Room to sound like Tila with some close spaces. It was pretty much identical in the end, but then you put in a different source and it all changes. Even the algorithms have a life of their own that is brought out by different inputs, if that makes sense. They aren't static at all. They are living, breathing entities just waiting to be tickled in the right way.
Ha!codec_spurt wrote:Let's all stop picking on and bullying hibidy now.hibidy wrote:Ah, I think I found a workaround maybe for the live convo verb crashing. Good news because once it works, it really sounds good. I think I said earlier that I didn't like it but I think the crashes are why![]()
Anyways, I'm verbed outI'm tired of testing, crashing, comparing, etc etc
Not that I don't want the thread to continue, but I'm worn out
He became the poster boy for a new generation of space-time algorithms, and he didn't like it. Like Elvis!
He needs time. And space.
I can't help feeling we have put our own greatest hopes and dreams, and even fears into his quest. Projected as a summer sun on a cloudy day.
We'll give him time to rest. None of us should feel sorry for him, he has a better Reverb arsenal than the next man. He bit off more than he could chew, but who amongst us has not made that fatal mistake in the pursuit of higher sonic excellence? I know I have.
Alas, poor Hibidy, I knew him well!
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026