Oh, I didn't see this, btw, is the range of the curve limited to +-20dB?Johnny Blade wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:07 pmMaster Match is LINEAR PHASE. And you can enable or disable its linear phase feature.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:53 pm It appears to be a parametric EQ, and I actually want a linear-phase one.
It's really the best I could test. Easy. Effective. Excellent.
The Best EQ-Matching Equalizer VST
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 26 posts since 13 Oct, 2018
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 26 posts since 13 Oct, 2018
I actually did select the whole wave ;Cooker wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:10 pmHmmm, just in case missed if you don't select the whole wave it will only analyze the first 30 seconds. My final suggestion would be to try har-bal.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:19 pmI actually tried it, the only problem with it is that its matching feature isn't precise enough.
I didn't exactly understand what you're after but also research for something that matches max-peak response (can't remember if melda can do that, voxengo can but the eq on it isn't detailed).
I remember trying Har-Bal v2.3 but I actually found it somehow hard to use and I couldn't get how things work (like how to edit the EQ curve);
I've tried Voxengo Curve EQ and it was indeed not detailed enough.
-
- KVRian
- 669 posts since 3 May, 2004
+1 for Equivocate!
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
I'm not sure if you are really talking about what you hear or what you see, but my guess is that you are not perfectly aware of the factors that come with the musical content.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:31 pmI actually want more precision than that to have more control about the sound I'm trying to achieve.Arrested Developer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:44 amThat's rather a problem in theory.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:38 amI think the problem with Equivocate is that it's limited to 26 bands.
In my experience Equivocate gives very convincing results.
At higher frequencies every single difference in the harmonic content in your music results in differences that can't be "matched", because this would mean that you have to change the corresponding notes in your music.
-> E.g. the difference between 3.3 kHz and 3.5 kHz is 1 halftone. If you want to perfectly match it, you'd need to use a different note...
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 26 posts since 13 Oct, 2018
What I'm trying to do is to create my own samples from noise;Arrested Developer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:19 pmI'm not sure if you are really talking about what you hear or what you see, but my guess is that you are not perfectly aware of the factors that come with the musical content.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:31 pmI actually want more precision than that to have more control about the sound I'm trying to achieve.Arrested Developer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:44 amThat's rather a problem in theory.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:38 amI think the problem with Equivocate is that it's limited to 26 bands.
In my experience Equivocate gives very convincing results.
At higher frequencies every single difference in the harmonic content in your music results in differences that can't be "matched", because this would mean that you have to change the corresponding notes in your music.
-> E.g. the difference between 3.3 kHz and 3.5 kHz is 1 halftone. If you want to perfectly match it, you'd need to use a different note...
So, I want an equalizer with a precise and accurate EQ-Matching function to see what different sounds look like as EQ curves, so that when I think of a sound, I should be able to determine the shape of the EQ curve that when applied to noise gives a close enough sound, then I can edit it a bit to get the sound I want.
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
"Noise" consists of lots of stochastically occurring frequencies (usually with a specific weighting) which pop up for short moments.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:30 pm What I'm trying to do is to create my own samples from noise;
So, I want an equalizer with a precise and accurate EQ-Matching function to see what different sounds look like as EQ curves, so that when I think of a sound, I should be able to determine the shape of the EQ curve that when applied to noise gives a close enough sound, then I can edit it a bit to get the sound I want.
For most sounds you'd need several continuous frequencies.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 26 posts since 13 Oct, 2018
I know that, I use noise for only a part of the sound, not all of it.Arrested Developer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:40 pm"Noise" consists of lots of stochastically occurring frequencies (usually with a specific weighting) which pop up for short moments.ahmedyaser100 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:30 pm What I'm trying to do is to create my own samples from noise;
So, I want an equalizer with a precise and accurate EQ-Matching function to see what different sounds look like as EQ curves, so that when I think of a sound, I should be able to determine the shape of the EQ curve that when applied to noise gives a close enough sound, then I can edit it a bit to get the sound I want.
For most sounds you'd need several continuous frequencies.
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 26 posts since 13 Oct, 2018
That's what I thought, and I don't think that there is an EQ made for this purpose so far, I'm just trying to get as close as possible to what I want using what's available.Arrested Developer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:56 pm @ahmedyaser100: ok, i see. That's really not the purpose of EQuivocate.
-
Arrested Developer Arrested Developer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=278287
- KVRian
- 677 posts since 8 Apr, 2012
MSpectralDynamics is not exactly a MatchEQ, but you could try to use it for that purpose (it has quite a learning curve though).
You could use it like a Denoiser with a learning function that you reverse.
You could use it like a Denoiser with a learning function that you reverse.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 26 posts since 13 Oct, 2018
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 26 posts since 13 Oct, 2018
I actually tried it, I'll try again and see if I can get better resultsArrested Developer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:56 pm MSpectralDynamics is not exactly a MatchEQ, but you could try to use it for that purpose (it has quite a learning curve though).
You could use it like a Denoiser with a learning function that you reverse.
-
- KVRAF
- 2565 posts since 2 Jul, 2010
Yeah, this seems like FFT territory rather than EQ filter territory. Sounds like OP is trying to reinvent spectral synthesis? Check out Spectral and Thorn.woggle wrote: ↑Sun Oct 14, 2018 10:53 am
That's interesting, why are you doing that? (if you have coding skills you can do that by randomising the phase info of the fft)
- KVRAF
- 6980 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
Somebody already mentioned iZotope OZONE?
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental