<edit> @ valley
What more features are you hoping for?
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
oh, and it would also preclude external hardware processing (using spare I/O) for any audio tracks in folders.. unless its applied to ALL the tracks in the folder.
<edit> @ valley
<edit> @ valley
-
- KVRAF
- 1974 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from Earth
or you could add a destination to the list in a track's control panel... which would be "parent" ... that way, T maintain's everything it can do now.. but you have the option to reroute audio/midi on a track to the tracks "parent" (meaning it's parent folder).
ModuLR / Radio
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Tell you what I would like to see work more in that way though.. freezing a group should also minimise all tracks that route to it IMO.
-
- KVRAF
- 4644 posts since 28 Nov, 2002 from Chicago
preclude? not at all. It would make it a little fiddly perhaps, but it wouldn't preclude it.platinumears wrote:oh, and it would also preclude external hardware processing (using spare I/O) for any audio tracks in folders.. unless its applied to ALL the tracks in the folder.
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Let me see if I understand you..ModuLR wrote:or you could add a destination to the list in a track's control panel... which would be "parent" ... that way, T maintain's everything it can do now.. but you have the option to reroute audio/midi on a track to the tracks "parent" (meaning it's parent folder).
folder tracks would have a default routing, which would include folder effects, but which could be over-ridden manually if needed?
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
I can't help thinking these suggestions are over complex though..
For once, the Cubase method (create as many folders as you like, and drag whatever you want into them) seems to me to be the simplest AND the most flexible.
For once, the Cubase method (create as many folders as you like, and drag whatever you want into them) seems to me to be the simplest AND the most flexible.
-
- KVRAF
- 1974 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from Earth
basically... that's the idea.. even better is that folder tracks could use the destination routing as well... such that folders are not limited to VST effects/synth.. the folder could have destination routing to an external synth or a specific audio output for bussing. However, it could all be overridden by not routing subtracks to "parent" and simple sending them whereever you want.platinumears wrote:Let me see if I understand you..
folder tracks would have a default routing, which would include folder effects, but which could be over-ridden manually if needed?
Personally, I think using folders to organize bussing and grouping is easier to comprehend visually, but this would permit both concepts to coexist peacefully.
ModuLR / Radio
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
ModuLR - your list is great - the work of a higher mind as always
Do you happen to know whether Jules has/is considering these ideas?
Regarding folder tracks, it's becoming a standard feature now... the latest Sonar/Fruityloops/Acid realeases all have some way of setting up folders. My gut feeling has been that Tracktion's clip-based paradigm made folders less relevant than for some of those others, because it is so easy to route a few things together.
Valley's suggestion also sound like a tidy solution...
Either way I think your various ideas would also provide another alternative to traditional "bussing", which would be most welcome. Racks of course are very flexible, but I can't help feeling they get away from Tracktion's user-friendly intuitive feel.
One of the really great things about Tracktion up until now has been the fact that Jules thought outside the box and came up with something that is not only different and original, but also far clearer and befitting a software context than the sequencers that went before. I really hope that some of your ideas - which I think are very fresh - get tested and if they work implemented. This is getting back to what we all loved about Tracktion in the first place!
Do you happen to know whether Jules has/is considering these ideas?
Regarding folder tracks, it's becoming a standard feature now... the latest Sonar/Fruityloops/Acid realeases all have some way of setting up folders. My gut feeling has been that Tracktion's clip-based paradigm made folders less relevant than for some of those others, because it is so easy to route a few things together.
Valley's suggestion also sound like a tidy solution...
Either way I think your various ideas would also provide another alternative to traditional "bussing", which would be most welcome. Racks of course are very flexible, but I can't help feeling they get away from Tracktion's user-friendly intuitive feel.
One of the really great things about Tracktion up until now has been the fact that Jules thought outside the box and came up with something that is not only different and original, but also far clearer and befitting a software context than the sequencers that went before. I really hope that some of your ideas - which I think are very fresh - get tested and if they work implemented. This is getting back to what we all loved about Tracktion in the first place!
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 6490 posts since 14 Jun, 2004 from Rochester, NY
Modulr, what specifically do you like about export links being kept? I personally don't want to have it laying around, and here's why. Okay in adobe audition you have a folder on the left with everything thats in the session (project). Simple and plain. When you load the session, the files are there. No need to play around with links or keeping links or deleting files by mistake. You simply press del to take it out of your project. How simple and efficient that is. Otherwise, say I had a few drum hits in the native sampler (of course i dont anymore) and then decided to go drum synth vsti. So i take out all of that, and then the links are left in my project folder. So I have to go one by one, and slowly erase it, but ensuring that i only erase the link to it. Don't you think that's an excessive trait? I personally do. I wish it were simpler and more efficient to just simply say "use this file" or dont use it. I don't get why it would keep file links like that, its really annyoing to me, if I'm missing out on something profound here, set me straight.
RonC
RonC
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Incredibly
I find myself with Ron on this one. I much prefer Audition's file management, and find Tracktion's fiddly. I can't work out how to purge unwanted audio takes in a simple time effective way.
-
- KVRAF
- 1974 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from Earth
I look at it like a back up solution. If you used something that at one point you thought was worthwhile, it's link remains in the projects folder. All of the sources you considered are in your projects folder. You don't have to go digging for the files again should you change your mind. It's all right there.. and when it's time to finalize the project, you simply export your edit. This will give you all the nice and tidy elements within your project.rpc9943 wrote:Modulr, what specifically do you like about export links being kept? I personally don't want to have it laying around, and here's why. Okay in adobe audition you have a folder on the left with everything thats in the session (project). Simple and plain. When you load the session, the files are there. No need to play around with links or keeping links or deleting files by mistake. You simply press del to take it out of your project. How simple and efficient that is. Otherwise, say I had a few drum hits in the native sampler (of course i dont anymore) and then decided to go drum synth vsti. So i take out all of that, and then the links are left in my project folder. So I have to go one by one, and slowly erase it, but ensuring that i only erase the link to it. Don't you think that's an excessive trait? I personally do. I wish it were simpler and more efficient to just simply say "use this file" or dont use it. I don't get why it would keep file links like that, its really annyoing to me, if I'm missing out on something profound here, set me straight.
RonC
The way I look at is...
- The project folder represents your creative process and the pool of ideas from which you put your edit together. Some elements you use, some you don't.. but if you considered it.. it's there.
- The edit itself represents the results of your ideas. It contains the creation itself.
Keeping links allows you to go back to previous ideas without having to look for them on your drives.
I think I like this method because this is how things work on the Avid. As you bring source material into your project.. you never really delete it because it's a pool of material that you might use in the creative process. You do keep the material easily avalable to you in your bins. When all is said and done, and it's finalized, you cosolidate the project so it's only using the material needed. Then you are free to delete stuff.
anyway, that's why I like it...
ModuLR / Radio
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
-
- KVRAF
- 7489 posts since 6 Jul, 2004
Thanks - I hadn't found that oneAD80 wrote:headquest wrote: I can't work out how to purge unwanted audio takes in a simple time effective way.
All you have to do is click on the project and find orphan clips. Then select them all and delete them. It doesnt seem to hard to me.
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
No Prob. Its pretty easy to use. Just remember that after deleting 1 file, it goes back to the project window. So be careful you dont delete anything you want on accident.headquest wrote:Thanks - I hadn't found that oneAD80 wrote:headquest wrote: I can't work out how to purge unwanted audio takes in a simple time effective way.
All you have to do is click on the project and find orphan clips. Then select them all and delete them. It doesnt seem to hard to me.

