I suspect your problem is that since TR is implicit, you can only solve it "exactly" for a strictly linear system or given an oracle (ie you can certainly evaluate TR for systems if you know the exact solution in advance). Naturally if you can find a convergent iterative solution, you can get arbitrarily close. In any case you have to consider the errors of any approximations and how they might affect the system in question.urosh wrote:I have this system of two diff. equations (you can say it's cousin of a filter) that burst into chaos behavior when you try to solve it numerically. And continuous system is most certainly not chaotic. I wouldn't mind chaotic behavior but with some parameter values it grinds to a halt ( stabilise at some constant value).mystran wrote:Trapezoidal shares this property (A-stability), but additionally maps unstable poles to unstable poles, which is important when you want self-oscillation.
BTW poles and frequency response have meaning for dominantly linear systems. If you have system with strong nonlinearity I guess you would have to envision some different way to characterize desired behavior of discrete system.
As for implicit Euler, since significant parts of the right-hand side of s are stable, it might not go unstable from errors that will push the poles into oscillation with trapezoidal method.