I have tried many parametric EQs and havent found any single worth to pay and use as an echange for native eq that comes with DAW. FL Studio Parametric EQ 2 just does the job very well + has spectrogram.
My advice: dont buy any, learn to use the one that comes with DAW.
p.s. Why you need any more anyways, its just an eq it wount make your music to better, not like compressor or saturation plugins can.
EQ Plugins
RELATED
PRODUCTS 1973 A Series EQ apQualizr2 CurveEQ$64.00Buy Enhanced EQ (Premium Tube Series) Epure$129.00Buy EQuality EQuick EQuilibrium GlissEQ$64.00Buy Oxford EQ$271.00Buy Passive-Active Pack Pro-Q 4$199.00Buy PSP NobleQ$69.00Buy PSP sQuad ReaEQ SonEQ SonEQ Pro Summit Audio EQF-100 Sweetone UAD bx_digital Vibe-EQ
PRODUCTS 1973 A Series EQ apQualizr2 CurveEQ$64.00Buy Enhanced EQ (Premium Tube Series) Epure$129.00Buy EQuality EQuick EQuilibrium GlissEQ$64.00Buy Oxford EQ$271.00Buy Passive-Active Pack Pro-Q 4$199.00Buy PSP NobleQ$69.00Buy PSP sQuad ReaEQ SonEQ SonEQ Pro Summit Audio EQF-100 Sweetone UAD bx_digital Vibe-EQ
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
-
- KVRAF
- 4054 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
EQ is the only thing you should be concerned about, if your concern is to make your music sound better. If you can't EQ, you can't mix.
I make music: progressive-acoustic | electronica/game-soundtrack work | progressive alt-metal
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
-
- KVRAF
- 5055 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
I am not sure, what you mean...metamorphosis wrote:EQ is the only thing you should be concerned about, if your concern is to make your music sound better. If you can't EQ, you can't mix.
If your statement is, you should know how to use an EQ properly you are 100% right...
If you want to state, you should worry about the quality of your EQ and should spend a lot of money on overhyped stuff, you cannot be more wrong... fact is, with any digital eq, which is coded correctly you can achieve the same results like any other available EQ on the market...
The only differences I see, with some EQ's it's less work to get the result you want to achieve and the GUI have to "click" with you...
Everything else is nonsense and noone, who wanted to convince me the opposite could show me an example, while there are a lot of examples from very hard working people all over the Internet prooving, what I am saying here...
It's always funny to see, how many people are spending a whole lot of time defending their fanboyism to hyped products with nothing but hot air and are not able to provide an convincing example... for doing this, they are too busy
-
- KVRAF
- 5530 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
You are right. For instance, I can get the same results by boosting 60hz on DDMF ProEQ, as well as on any Pultec Emulation. The difference is almost unnoticeable.Trancit wrote:I am not sure, what you mean...metamorphosis wrote:EQ is the only thing you should be concerned about, if your concern is to make your music sound better. If you can't EQ, you can't mix.
If your statement is, you should know how to use an EQ properly you are 100% right...
If you want to state, you should worry about the quality of your EQ and should spend a lot of money on overhyped stuff, you cannot be more wrong... fact is, with any digital eq, which is coded correctly you can achieve the same results like any other available EQ on the market...
The only differences I see, with some EQ's it's less work to get the result you want to achieve and the GUI have to "click" with you...
Everything else is nonsense and noone, who wanted to convince me the opposite could show me an example, while there are a lot of examples from very hard working people all over the Internet prooving, what I am saying here...
It's always funny to see, how many people are spending a whole lot of time defending their fanboyism to hyped products with nothing but hot air and are not able to provide an convincing example... for doing this, they are too busy
-
- KVRist
- 389 posts since 22 May, 2012
-
- KVRAF
- 42529 posts since 21 Dec, 2005
Mods, please lock the thread....Trancit wrote: It's always funny to see, how many people are spending a whole lot of time defending their fanboyism to hyped products with nothing but hot air and are not able to provide an convincing example... for doing this, they are too busy
-
- Banned
- 10196 posts since 12 Mar, 2012 from the Bavarian Alps to my feet and the globe around my head
Fixed bands?
BootEQ from Variety of Sound is much better IMO:
-
- KVRAF
- 4054 posts since 8 Jan, 2005 from Hamilton, New Zealand
I wasn't defending any particular eq, I was responding to the dumb post saying that eq doesn't make your tracks sound better. Some EQ's do sound different, so I'm not really agreeing with what you say either. There are a lot of analog modelling differences.Trancit wrote:I am not sure, what you mean...metamorphosis wrote:EQ is the only thing you should be concerned about, if your concern is to make your music sound better. If you can't EQ, you can't mix.
If your statement is, you should know how to use an EQ properly you are 100% right...
If you want to state, you should worry about the quality of your EQ and should spend a lot of money on overhyped stuff, you cannot be more wrong... fact is, with any digital eq, which is coded correctly you can achieve the same results like any other available EQ on the market...
The only differences I see, with some EQ's it's less work to get the result you want to achieve and the GUI have to "click" with you...
Everything else is nonsense and noone, who wanted to convince me the opposite could show me an example, while there are a lot of examples from very hard working people all over the Internet prooving, what I am saying here...
It's always funny to see, how many people are spending a whole lot of time defending their fanboyism to hyped products with nothing but hot air and are not able to provide an convincing example... for doing this, they are too busy
Cheers
I make music: progressive-acoustic | electronica/game-soundtrack work | progressive alt-metal
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
Win 10/11 Simplifier | Also, Specialized C++ containers
-
- KVRAF
- 5530 posts since 26 Apr, 2007 from Noosphere
+1 . Boosting lows in both sections gives a really nice "boom" and for free.Tricky-Loops wrote:Fixed bands?
BootEQ from Variety of Sound is much better IMO:
-
- KVRist
- 439 posts since 7 Mar, 2011 from Pleasanton, CA
Beautiful GUI. I wish he developed Mac AUs.Tricky-Loops wrote:Fixed bands?
BootEQ from Variety of Sound is much better IMO:
Seasoned IT vet, Mac user, and lover of music. Always learning.
-
- KVRAF
- 5055 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
They do not sound different... that's the whole point...metamorphosis wrote:...Some EQ's do sound different, so I'm not really agreeing with what you say either. There are a lot of analog modelling differences.
Cheers
If you know how, you can emulate any existing filter shape with any digital EQ...
If there is some "analog emulation"... that means to 95% only saturation... no miracle here...
And about the example mentioned here about the pultec emulations... if you know the ratio between the boost and the "attenuation" it's quite easy to reproduce this behaviour...
For everything else of "magical sound"... feel free to post some examples, which are only possible with EQ XYZ... I am curious to hear them...
If you cannot... would be just another proof for my statement...