Wouldn't that make possible audio input in Falcon? (if you plan of adding that at some moment in the future)
UVI Falcon - hybrid instrument - version 3.01 released - rumors, ads, praise, mud wrestling and off-topic inside!
RELATED
PRODUCTS Alive - UVI Falcon Expansion Ambient Strings for Falcon / MachFive 3 Falcon Falcon AIR Falcon Singles - Acoustic E-Bow Falcon Singles - Ambient Piano Falcon Singles - Bass Flute Falcon Singles - Celtic Harp Falcon Singles - Crotales Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol.1 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol2 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol3 Falcon Singles - Frame Drums & Friends Falcon Singles - Glockenspiel Falcon Singles - HANG Falcon Singles - Oud Falcon Singles - Stick Cello Falcon Singles - Water Bells Falcon Singles Singing Bowls & Friends NOIZE Textures (Wav/Dune Presets) Scattered Entity Vol. 1 for Falcon/MachFive 3
PRODUCTS Alive - UVI Falcon Expansion Ambient Strings for Falcon / MachFive 3 Falcon Falcon AIR Falcon Singles - Acoustic E-Bow Falcon Singles - Ambient Piano Falcon Singles - Bass Flute Falcon Singles - Celtic Harp Falcon Singles - Crotales Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol.1 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol2 Falcon Singles - Falcon Scapes Vol3 Falcon Singles - Frame Drums & Friends Falcon Singles - Glockenspiel Falcon Singles - HANG Falcon Singles - Oud Falcon Singles - Stick Cello Falcon Singles - Water Bells Falcon Singles Singing Bowls & Friends NOIZE Textures (Wav/Dune Presets) Scattered Entity Vol. 1 for Falcon/MachFive 3
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 11 Mar, 2021 from Romania
-
- KVRAF
- 1790 posts since 13 May, 2004 from Germany
Thanks very muchotristan wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 12:01 pmyesrasmusklump wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:49 am Has it the fix for making the preset files with acoustic samples libraries smaller ?
- KVRist
- 413 posts since 29 Apr, 2019
That's already possible in vst2digitallysane wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 1:07 pmWouldn't that make possible audio input in Falcon? (if you plan of adding that at some moment in the future)
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 6222 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
-
- KVRAF
- 3027 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
apple's WWDC is next week. might want to wait a week and see if something new is coming from apple. might be too soon for another new revision of the macbook pro but who knows.. we're in weird times.machinesworking wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:16 pmAny news about support for M1 - Apple Silicon?
I'm about to purchase a new MacBook Pro, and it's going to be an M1.
How is Falcon running in Rosetta?
- KVRAF
- 2281 posts since 25 Apr, 2009 from Doritos Land where no goblins are allowed
I might be totally stupid (well, yes I really am, there are things you can't deny in life) but whatever I try, I'm totally unable to apply an ADSR filter to a custom sampled patch. I've tried to search for solutions on google, no luck so far. I simply want to make a very simple cutoff to follow an envelope : actually I want it to close very shortly after the attack. But the filter stands still, it just never follows the envelope.
It seems to be applied correctly since 1/I can hear the filter and 2/if I click on "inverted" in the modulation parameters, the filter changes its behaviour. But it still doesn't move with the envelope.
Can anyone please direct me to a solution please ? I must have missed something.
What I've done is :
- add a filter to the layer
- right click on the cutoff, add modulation to layer, any envelope
=> the filter doesn't move with the envelope
(of course I've tried many other ways, nothing is working)
It seems to be applied correctly since 1/I can hear the filter and 2/if I click on "inverted" in the modulation parameters, the filter changes its behaviour. But it still doesn't move with the envelope.
Can anyone please direct me to a solution please ? I must have missed something.
What I've done is :
- add a filter to the layer
- right click on the cutoff, add modulation to layer, any envelope
=> the filter doesn't move with the envelope
(of course I've tried many other ways, nothing is working)
Please don’t read the above post. It’s a stupid one. Simply pass.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 16158 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
You have to add the filter on keygroup level, not layer level. This is the top FAQ with Falcon.DJErmac wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 2:26 am I might be totally stupid (well, yes I really am, there are things you can't deny in life) but whatever I try, I'm totally unable to apply an ADSR filter to a custom sampled patch. I've tried to search for solutions on google, no luck so far. I simply want to make a very simple cutoff to follow an envelope : actually I want it to close very shortly after the attack. But the filter stands still, it just never follows the envelope.
It seems to be applied correctly since 1/I can hear the filter and 2/if I click on "inverted" in the modulation parameters, the filter changes its behaviour. But it still doesn't move with the envelope.
Can anyone please direct me to a solution please ? I must have missed something.
What I've done is :
- add a filter to the layer
- right click on the cutoff, add modulation to layer, any envelope
=> the filter doesn't move with the envelope
(of course I've tried many other ways, nothing is working)
- KVRAF
- 2281 posts since 25 Apr, 2009 from Doritos Land where no goblins are allowed
Thank you so much, will try this !Sampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 2:48 amYou have to add the filter on keygroup level, not layer level. This is the top FAQ with Falcon.DJErmac wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 2:26 am I might be totally stupid (well, yes I really am, there are things you can't deny in life) but whatever I try, I'm totally unable to apply an ADSR filter to a custom sampled patch. I've tried to search for solutions on google, no luck so far. I simply want to make a very simple cutoff to follow an envelope : actually I want it to close very shortly after the attack. But the filter stands still, it just never follows the envelope.
It seems to be applied correctly since 1/I can hear the filter and 2/if I click on "inverted" in the modulation parameters, the filter changes its behaviour. But it still doesn't move with the envelope.
Can anyone please direct me to a solution please ? I must have missed something.
What I've done is :
- add a filter to the layer
- right click on the cutoff, add modulation to layer, any envelope
=> the filter doesn't move with the envelope
(of course I've tried many other ways, nothing is working)
EDIT : the filter is working at last, thank you again !
But still, there is something wrong with what I'm doing : the filter is acting like it's a parallel effect.
I have :
-Part 1
--Layer 1
---Keygroup (the filter is here)
---my samples
Please don’t read the above post. It’s a stupid one. Simply pass.
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 6222 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
Yeah, it's almost a given that Apple's releasing the 16" M(1X or 2) Apple Silicon Macbook Pro next week, too many leaks. If I don't have to sell a liver to get it, that's what I'm getting, otherwise the Air without a fan.dayjob wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 1:39 amapple's WWDC is next week. might want to wait a week and see if something new is coming from apple. might be too soon for another new revision of the macbook pro but who knows.. we're in weird times.machinesworking wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:16 pmAny news about support for M1 - Apple Silicon?
I'm about to purchase a new MacBook Pro, and it's going to be an M1.
How is Falcon running in Rosetta?
Bitwig is Apple Silicon native, with that, U-He and Falcon I can wait on the rest without feeling too let down. Long shot I know but I have to ask.
-
- KVRAF
- 3027 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
at worst you'll probably have to run it under rosetta 2 according to their support info:machinesworking wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 3:57 amYeah, it's almost a given that Apple's releasing the 16" M(1X or 2) Apple Silicon Macbook Pro next week, too many leaks. If I don't have to sell a liver to get it, that's what I'm getting, otherwise the Air without a fan.dayjob wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 1:39 amapple's WWDC is next week. might want to wait a week and see if something new is coming from apple. might be too soon for another new revision of the macbook pro but who knows.. we're in weird times.machinesworking wrote: ↑Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:16 pmAny news about support for M1 - Apple Silicon?
I'm about to purchase a new MacBook Pro, and it's going to be an M1.
How is Falcon running in Rosetta?
Bitwig is Apple Silicon native, with that, U-He and Falcon I can wait on the rest without feeling too let down. Long shot I know but I have to ask.
https://support.uvi.net/hc/en-us/articl ... 11-Big-Sur
UVI products are supported on macOS 11 Big Sur on Intel-based Macs only, and M1-based Macs using Rosetta 2. UVI plug-ins do not offer native M1 support yet.
To use UVI products on new Apple Silicon Macs (ARM-based M1 processors), you may need to launch your DAW under Rosetta 2 (right-click the application icon, select "Get Info" then select "Open using Rosetta").
-
- KVRist
- 287 posts since 15 Dec, 2019
For the next big update (maybe Falcon 3?) I hope that UVI concentrates on the usability/easiness of the software. Maybe some coloring or other visual improvements would help to differentiate between sections of the software, for example levels (keygroups, layers, program)? Falcon is extremely powerful, we all know that, but the GUI is not at its best.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 16158 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
Each sample needs its own keygroup filter, so select all keygroups first, then add the filters, then apply the modulation.DJErmac wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 2:52 amThank you so much, will try this !Sampleconstruct wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 2:48 amYou have to add the filter on keygroup level, not layer level. This is the top FAQ with Falcon.DJErmac wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 2:26 am I might be totally stupid (well, yes I really am, there are things you can't deny in life) but whatever I try, I'm totally unable to apply an ADSR filter to a custom sampled patch. I've tried to search for solutions on google, no luck so far. I simply want to make a very simple cutoff to follow an envelope : actually I want it to close very shortly after the attack. But the filter stands still, it just never follows the envelope.
It seems to be applied correctly since 1/I can hear the filter and 2/if I click on "inverted" in the modulation parameters, the filter changes its behaviour. But it still doesn't move with the envelope.
Can anyone please direct me to a solution please ? I must have missed something.
What I've done is :
- add a filter to the layer
- right click on the cutoff, add modulation to layer, any envelope
=> the filter doesn't move with the envelope
(of course I've tried many other ways, nothing is working)
EDIT : the filter is working at last, thank you again !
But still, there is something wrong with what I'm doing : the filter is acting like it's a parallel effect.
I have :
-Part 1
--Layer 1
---Keygroup (the filter is here)
---my samples
-
- KVRian
- 913 posts since 9 Aug, 2018
Audio input would be very much welcome, agreed. And seconding UI/workflow improvements in general.
Also, is there any way to make IRCAM Stretch usable for those without next-gen supercomputers (presumably) ... ?
Also, is there any way to make IRCAM Stretch usable for those without next-gen supercomputers (presumably) ... ?
-
WatchTheGuitar WatchTheGuitar https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=440193
- KVRAF
- 12944 posts since 30 Apr, 2019
Couldn’t it instantly decimate the potential market for their standalone FX plugins like Thorus and Sparkverb if it lets you set up Falcon to take the input, pass it through an effect and output the result?
I don’t own them so not sure if they’re exactly the same as the ones included in Falcon.
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 11 Mar, 2021 from Romania
It would be great to at least have side chaining and live envelope generation from external audio.WatchTheGuitar wrote: ↑Sat Jun 05, 2021 12:03 pmCouldn’t it instantly decimate the potential market for their standalone FX plugins like Thorus and Sparkverb if it lets you set up Falcon to take the input, pass it through an effect and output the result?
I don’t own them so not sure if they’re exactly the same as the ones included in Falcon.
I don't think people using the effects standalone would want to go through a Falcon instance just to use Sparkverb.